By Richard J. Evans
In Cosmopolitan Islanders one of many world's top historians asks why it's that such a lot of trendy and influential British historians have dedicated themselves to the examine of the ecu continent. Books at the background of France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and plenty of different eu nations, and of Europe extra in general, have often reached the best-seller lists either in Britain and (in translation) in these ecu nations themselves. but an identical is emphatically now not actual in opposite. Richard J. Evans lines the evolution of British curiosity within the heritage of Continental Europe from the Enlightenment to the 20 th century. He is going directly to speak about why British historians who paintings on features of ecu background right now have selected to take action and why this extraordinary culture is now less than risk. Cosmopolitan Islanders ends with a few reflections on what has to be performed to make sure its continuation sooner or later.
Read Online or Download Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and the European Continent PDF
Similar historiography books
A suite of essays on present questions of historiography, illustrated as regards to Islamic historiography. the most issues are conceptions of time and temporality, the makes use of of the previous, old periodization, old categorization, and the structure of historic items, now not least these known as 'civilization' and 'Islam.
Winner of the Medieval Academy of America's Haskins Medal for 1991, The Narrators of Barbarian background treats the 4 writers who're the most early resources for our wisdom of the Ostrogoths, Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Lombards. In his preface to this paperback version, Goffart examines the questions his paintings has evoked considering the fact that its unique ebook in 1988 and enlarges the bibliography to account for fresh scholarship.
In 1989, because the Berlin Wall crumbled and the chilly struggle dissipated, the yank political commentator Francis Fukuyama wrote a well-known essay, entitled The finish of historical past. ” Fukuyama argued that the dying of the war of words among Communism and capitalism, and the growth of Western liberal democracy, signaled the endpoint of humanity’s sociocultural and political evolution, the waning of conventional energy politics, and the trail towards a extra peaceable global.
- History: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
- The Origin and Goal of History (Routledge Revivals)
- A Student's Guide to the Study of History (ISI Guides to the Major Disciplines)
- Rethinking American History in a Global Age
- Inventing American History (Boston Review Books)
Additional resources for Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and the European Continent
Finally, the ‘special relationship’ between Britain and the USA – backed, of course, by a common language – ensures that 9% of American historians work on Britain, and the same proportion of British historians on America. Yet the mutual impact of the two historiographical traditions has been less weighty than that of, say, British historians like Sir Raymond Carr and Paul Preston on Spanish history. ’ For later periods, he describes American writing on British history, with a few exceptions, as ‘respectable at best’.
The same has in general not been true in reverse. Explaining this inequality of impact is not at first sight very easy. Boyd Hilton notes, for example, that while Halévy became interested in Victorian Britain because it was the most powerful country in the world, this was no longer really the case after the First World War, and even less after the Second, which is when the historical profession in every European country expanded at its fastest. By this time, the history of most European countries had become far more turbulent, and thrown up many more urgent questions to answer, than that of the United Kingdom.
Thus while 40% of French historians have published on both domestic and foreign history, as have 38% of German historians, and 36% of Italian, only 21% of British historians have done so. Even more striking are the figures for the USA. The proportion of American historians who devote themselves exclusively to the study of countries other than their own is actually a majority – 61%. But comparative history is weak in the USA too; only some 11% of American historians do domestic and foreign history together.