By S. R. Bhatt
Knowledge performs a truly major position in Buddhism, because it is the gateway to enlightenment and nirvana. This quantity offers a transparent and exhaustive exposition of Buddhist epistemology and common sense, in keeping with the works of classical thinkers akin to Vasubandhu, Dinnãga, and Dharmakiriti. It lines the ancient improvement of this thought, identifies crucial colleges and thinkers, and defines its major concepts—the standards of fact, the character of truth, and the ideas of notion and inference, the single assets of data approved in Buddhist philosophy. The appendix includes the Sanskrit unique and an annotated translation of Nyaya Prave'sa, a key textual content of Buddhist epistemology, which discusses the character of notion and inference and their fallacies.
Read Online or Download Buddhist Epistemology PDF
Similar comparative religion books
Drawing at the knowledge of instructor from the world's nice spiritual traditions, together with Robert Thurman, Sharon Salzberg, Ram Dass, mom Mary Clare Vincent, Joan Halifax, and Rabbi Jonathan Omer-Man, presents of the Spirit deepens our appreciation of such daily exercises as waking up, consuming, and dealing, in addition to the plentiful rewards of having fun with song, gardening, strolling, and being with others.
Written through best practitioner-scholars who deliver a serious but empathetic eye to the subject, this textbook offers a entire examine peace and violence in seven international religions. * bargains a transparent and systematic narrative with insurance of Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and local American religions * Introduces a unique faith and its sacred texts in each one bankruptcy; discusses rules of peace, conflict, nonviolence, and permissible violence; recounts ancient responses to violence; and highlights contributors in the culture operating towards peace and justice * Examines ideas inside of their non secular context for a greater realizing of the values, motivations, and ethics concerned * comprises student-friendly pedagogical positive factors, reminiscent of enriching end-of-chapter opinions through practitioners of alternative traditions, definitions of key words, dialogue questions, and extra analyzing sections
Debates in regards to the position and nature of the country are on the center of recent politics. notwithstanding, the kingdom itself is still notoriously tricky to outline, and the time period is topic to a number of various interpretations. during this publication, special country theorist Bob Jessop presents a severe advent to the nation as either an idea and a truth.
- Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept
- Male Homosexualities and World Religions
- Blood That Cries Out From the Earth: The Psychology of Religious Terrorism
- The Role of Revelation in the World's Religions
- Christian Responses to Islam in Nigeria: A Contextual Study of Ambivalent Encounters
- Religion and Popular Culture in America, Edition: 2 Revised
Extra resources for Buddhist Epistemology
3 5 That is, he regards nirvikalpaka pratyaksa as a sort of inchoate cognition in which neither the particular nor the generalized aspect is cognized; nor are they distinguished. Whatever is the interpretation of Kumarila’s position, for him it is indeterminate or nonconceptual and therefore nonverbal. The second stage is that of savikalpaka pratyaksa, which is a determinate cognition in which the object is cognized by the mind along with its characterizations. Like the Samkhya and Mlmamsa thinkers, Nyaya-Vaisesika thinkers also accept both stages of perception, and most of them regard them as equally valid.
The linguistic expression corresponding to “S” is a little ambiguous, whereas the linguistic expression corresponding to “K - C” does not contain any ambiguity. Perhaps, Vasubandhu’s definition could have been improved upon by the addition of the word “eva, ” which would have meant that a perceptual cognition is that which is determined by the object solely and exclusively. But Diñnága thinks it better to put the definition negatively so as to avoid any scope for ambiguity. However, it must be made clear that Diñnága does not reject Vasubandhu’s definition but only brings out its implication in clearer terms.
It is thus clear that the two types of knowledge are quite different not only in their nature but also in the spheres of their operation. While defining pratyaksa, thinkers from Dinnaga onward always insist on its being kalpanapodha. Kalpana stands for both thought and speech, and, therefore, the phrase ttkalpandpodham,>implies two things: ( 1 ) it is nonconceptual, and (2 ) it is nonverbal. Buddhists start with a dichotomous distinction between a knowledge that is perceptual and a knowledge that is nonperceptual, that is, conceptual.